CDFF also alleged that Maldonado and Pittman at all times acted in concert with each other and on behalf of each of them and the other. In the complaint, CDFF alleged that Maldonado and Pittman were members of CDFF and breached their contractual obligations to CDFF by failing to pay fines that were properly levied against them. Maldonado (Maldonado) and Pittman each owed CDFF over $22,000 in fines. On June 16, 2004, CDFF filed a complaint for damages in Fresno Superior Court alleging that Richard A. Petitioner, thereby rendering the confirmation of Petitioner`s expulsion inevitable, and Petitioner`s appeal pointless. In his petition, Pittman alleged that appeal of the expulsion decision was excused due to futility or impossibility since the matter would be heard by the very Board participants who had acted against. Pittman (Pittman) filed a petition for a writ of mandate in Sacramento Superior Court seeking reversal of the fine imposed against him by CDF Firefighters (CDFF), a labor union, and reinstatement as a member. For the following reasons, we reverse the grant of summary judgment. In this case, we are asked to determine whether the superior court erred in granting summary judgment on a labor union`s contract cause of action against two former members, and in denying a petition for writ of mandate filed by one of those members. Pittman.Д¬arroll, Burdick & McDonough, Ronald Yank, Gregg McLean Adam and Jennifer S. Driscoll, Jr., for Defendant and Appellant Michael S. Van Rozeboom, for Defendant and Appellant Richard A. (Opinion by Ardaiz, P.J., with Harris, J., and Kane, J., concurring.)Д¬aswell, Bell & Hillison, and Russell G. MALDONADO et al., Defendants and Appellants.

See Modification of Opinion at 163 Cal.App.4th 1556bД¬DF FIREFIGHTERS, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Maldonado (2008) 158 Cal.App.4th 1226 Д¬DF Firefighters v.

Cdf fire fighters